Sam's Corner: Direct Indexing

What is Direct Indexing & and Why You Should Care

This may be the most biased statement in the world, but investing is cool. The product structure you invest in is also cool and extremely important to get right, especially in after-tax accounts. There are many product structures available to the investing public: mutual funds, exchange traded funds (ETFs), unit investment trusts (UITs), individual stocks, bonds, options, certificates of deposits (CDs), and countless others. One product type that I omitted is something called a separately managed account (SMA). Within this product type are strategies largely known as direct indexing or custom indexing.

A Quick Note on What a SMA is: These are strategies professionally managed by money managers similar to a mutual fund or ETF. The difference is that instead of one line item lumping all the investments into a single name, the investor directly owns all securities in the strategy. Using a stock SMA as an example, in a mutual fund or ETF this would appear to be one item. In a SMA, one strategy could show 20 to 500 individual stocks owned directly in your account. This provides transparency for the investor into which positions the investment manager is buying and selling in your account.

We love transparency. Combine this with tax efficiency, and we have a match made in heaven. Enter direct indexing. A direct index is a type of SMA that buys a passive market index, such as the S&P 500, where you own each individual stock in it. Originally, direct indexing was designed to focus on customization for clients looking to screen out investments that conflicted with their personal values. Religious organizations used them to exclude certain investments, and individuals did much the same with “sin stocks” such as tobacco, gambling, or weapons manufacturers. The product is still widely used for these reasons, but the side benefit of tax efficiency soon became the star of the show.

In a mutual fund or ETF, when the value goes down, we look at our balances, lick our wounds and hope for an up day tomorrow. In a direct index, we benefit from both poor and great days in the market. The down days are the difference – since we own the names in the index, any of those which may be down in value, we can sell at a loss. We can use these losses to offset comparable capital gains in the same tax year or carry them forward to future tax years to match future capital gains.

How Does it Work?

On down market days, the manager, often a trade algorithm, identifies losses in the account and sells those positions to realize the loss. There is a Wash Sale rule to be aware of. Essentially, if you buy the same holding back within 30 days of selling it, the IRS treats the position as if you never sold it at all; meaning you keep your original cost basis, not allowing you to realize that loss. The manager works around this to ensure positions are not violating the wash sale rule, while replicating a passive index with a margin of tracking error to that index (usually around 1% up or down, but again varies by situation).

Keeping with the S&P 500 example, the manager may own 300 individual securities in the account at any given time. Those not currently owned, are intentionally excluded to avoid overlapping exposure to be rebalanced into.

This is boring, but incredibly powerful. Depending on income, long-term capital gains can be taxed at 0%, 15% or 20%, while short-term capital gains are taxed at your ordinary income rate. However, if we have losses pooled from those poor market days in our direct index, we can use them to offset the equivalent amount of gain when realizing the sale of an asset in investment accounts. This generates what is colloquially known as, “tax alpha”, which is a fancy way to say, excess return from paying less in taxes. In qualified accounts (Traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs, 401k’s, SEP IRAs, etc.), this doesn’t matter since gains are not taxed until we withdraw funds. In after-tax accounts, it is a powerful tool, enabling us to rebalance concentrated positions with unrealized capital gains, or to sell other holdings that may have done well, but we don’t particularly love anymore, without triggering a tax hit.

Investment minimums vary for each direct index provider and the index they try to recreate. Consultation with a tax professional is advisable when discussing assets externally to those we may manage.

Sam's Corner: Mind the (Behavioral) Gap

Odds are we have all been in situations where you question, what the heck is this person thinking? The choices others make can strike us as incredibly irrational. In cases such as this, it is easy to identify the right choice when observing others, however judgement becomes clouded when it us making decisions. We are all different in our approach to decision-making. Our predispositions potentially skew our thinking to less-than-ideal choices. This can be problematic in our daily lives, but also rears its head in our long-term investment decisions.

Traditional thinking treats the broad market and individuals as universally rational actors. These assumptions are the foundation upon which the Efficient Market Hypothesis (a future topic we will cover) was created. Famous economist and Nobel laureate Eugene Fama from the University of Chicago popularized this hypothesis. However, the EMH has been challenged by a group of rogue economists led notably by the late Daniel Kahneman and Richard Thaler. This clique is known under the banner of behavioral economists. The new field of behavioral finance blends psychology and traditional economics, illustrating that cognitive and emotional biases can impair investor behavior.

Through a near endless list of studies, researchers have successfully identified prominent biases that investors are prone to, causing suboptimal investment outcomes. A few of these common biases we at the Paradigm Group work with clients to identify and overcome are:

- Loss Aversion – it sucks to lose money. So much so that people prefer to avoid losses over making the same number of gains. Losing $500 is much more painful than winning that same $500. This affects individuals and professional investors alike. We can find ourselves ignoring investment opportunities’ out of fear that markets move the wrong way against us. This thinking can create analysis paralysis and may cause individuals to hoard mountains of cash under their mattresses or opt for risk-free assets instead of focusing on long-term growth objectives to meet financial goals. One way to overcome this bias is to set specific, identifiable targets to buy or sell an investment. Focusing on that goal introduces discipline to get off the sidelines and encourage participation in the market.

- The Endowment Effect – people typically value an object higher if they already own it. This trait, known as the endowment effect, can lead to holding on to a free coffee mug or ratty old college sweatshirt. This is harmless enough, but also influences larger decision making such as an owner overvaluing the sale price of companies they founded. The endowment effect is often found with inherited investment assets. For good reason we place sentimental value on inherited stock positions. If it was good enough for mom or dad, it should do the job for us. However, risk characteristics and financial goals for individuals are vastly different. What is an appropriate stock holding for one person may not be for another – sentimentality may cloud our judgement in the appropriateness of holding onto an asset passed between generations.

- Overconfidence – 73% of drivers think they are better than average. People tend to overestimate their abilities beyond just their driving skills. Despite what I tell my coworkers, friends or anyone who will listen, and this is painful to admit… I am not the next Warren Buffet. Like driving, or my delusions of grandeur, investors fall prey to overestimating that they are smarter or more well informed than the average participant in the market. This bias affects individual investors and professional money managers alike. In fact, it can be more acutely felt by professional fund managers with 74% thinking they are above average. They are probably the same folks who think they are good drivers! The more confident we are, the costlier mistakes can be.

- Confirmation Bias – has anyone noticed that politics are polarizing? We all know folks who get their news from a single source, rejecting all other information. Why is this the case? It is comforting to reinforce our existing beliefs. Challenging any sort of strongly engrained idea can be treated as an attack on how we view the world. Confirmation bias is easily identifiable in the political realm but found constantly in investment markets. If I am all-in on a single equity, odds are I want to read good news about it and disregard troubling reports. It is similarly difficult to be malleable in our investment thinking to process information that may cut against our beliefs for owning an asset.

With the field of behavioral finance being relatively new, it makes it an exciting time to follow along as new biases are being uncovered. The majority of rockstar researchers in this space are alive, and publishing. Their findings challenge long held tenets in the traditional investment community. We all want what is best for ourselves, families, and communities, but may not act in the best manner to achieve our goals. While it is impossible to be an entirely unemotional and logical, we can take steps to confronting bad behavior patterns in our investing.

One way to counteract these behavioral biases is to consult an external party – ala a financial advisor (and their humble employees who find behavioral research interesting). Working with an advisor can help avoid pitfalls in asset allocation decisions and identify potential blind spots that may have negative implications for our long-term financial plans.

For those who may be interested in further reading, here are a few very accessible book recommendations on the topic:

-  Misbehaving – Richard Thaler

- Thinking Fast and Slow – Daniel Kahneman

- The Psychology of Money: Timeless Lessons on Wealth, Greed, and Happiness – Morgan Housel

- Irrational Exuberance – Robert Shiller